This blog is quite bemusing. Abrahamists are after each other on whose version of their god is right: https://bloggingtheology.com/2019/09/02/islam-jack-chick-and-the-battle-for-souls-your-best-life
It does come down to “My imaginary god is the right one. No, mine is! Your holy book is contradictory. No, yours is.”
The blog is a great example of how theists use the same arguments and utterly ignore that they are attacking the same arguments they use when presented by an opposing theist.
Now, to get that taste out of your virtual mouth, here’s a great interview between Mike Shermer and Phil Zuckerman about Phil’s new book, What It Means to Be Moral: Why Religion is not necessary for living an ethical life.
Club Schadenfreude 
The Outsider Test of Faith would be helpful for most of them. Alas, no such hope that they will ever consider it
LikeLike
that it would.
LikeLike
I like it when religionists argue amongst themselves about which of the lies they are peddling is the truth. It cannot end in agreement
LikeLike
Search for the video on YouTube of Kent hovind and Hugh Ross arguing young earth vs old earth creation. Hilarious
LikeLike
oh no. I hadn’t heard of that video. I’ll definitely look for it. 🙂
LikeLike
Hovind actually accused Ross of representing a different God because he espoused old earth creation
LikeLike
LOL. ain’t religion great!
LikeLike
I mention because of the arguments that Islam and Christianity don’t have the same god,. They do, but just different takes on him, similarly to how hovind sees old earth creation vs what he believes
LikeLike