Not So Polite Dinner Conversation – putting jesus on trial

Found this on a rather silly christian blog. It’s all of the common christian baseless arguments in one place. a few memes at the end.

And here’s how that all fails:

I’ve put this jesus on trial and unsurprisingly, imaginary beings fail that.

Jesus’s teachings are all over the map. One can see how different authors made up different things.

Considering the contradictions, if jesus was real, he was a lunatic.  Anything worthwhile that is attributed to jesus was around far longer than this religion.

These teachings are worthless since they are all based on the claim that anyone who disagrees with jesus deserves death and worse.  No need to respect that nonsense.

No evidence for jesus’ life and Christians can’t agree on what happened during it. 

Since these stories contradict each other, all you have is a mess about different characters.

Again, the teachings aren’t consistent and the character isn’t consistent.

No evidence jesus existed, so no evidence of respect for what isn’t there.  Your presuppositions fail you. 

Again, you have a fictional character so it didn’t live at all.  If Jesus existed and had these contradictory thoughts, then it was an idiot and a lunatic. 

Who did jesus credit? Well, this jesus couldn’t decide if it was god or not. So all of your nonsense based on your assumptions fail yet again. 

Indeed “which god” since Christians all invent different ones that contradict each other.  You poor deras can’t agree on what morals your god wants. 

Some atheists, if unfamiliar with the bible, might think JC was okay.  I’ve read the bible and when your imaginary friend says “bring those who don’t want me as king before me and slaughter them”, I know this is pure ignorant nonsense. 

Curious how the gospels can’t agree on how jesus faced death.  The gospel of john simply ignores the nonsense in gesthemane.  There is no “whole jesus”.

There are no contemporary hostile witnesses.  The only thing Christians have are historians who mention Christians, not that what they believed was true.  These historans are decades after the supposed event, an event that Christians can’t agree on when it happened. 

No evidence for the apostles either, so your claims of “changes” are baseless.


Paul can’t even keep his origin story straight, and claimed to have seen jesus in a “vision”  aka no evidence for such nonsense.  Paul also contradicts jesus and shows a strange ignorance of anything jesus did. 

No such thing as a “modern hostile witness” since christians can’t even agree onwhere this supposed “empty tomb” even is. 

No resurrection, no one noticed any certain day where there was a major earthquake, the sky darkening and dead jews wandering around roman-occupied Jerusalem.  Even three out of the four anonymous gospels authors didn’t notice that last thing. 

So your imaginary friend fails the trial miserably.  You have nothing. 

You also forget one “L”:  Legend.  Christians are amazingly incompetent as apologists for their religion’s claims. 

No wonder this pastor and church don’t have comments allowed.

4 thoughts on “Not So Polite Dinner Conversation – putting jesus on trial

  1. I remember being told as a Christian that there was “more evidence for Jesus than any other historical event” lol. Later, after my deconversion, I did some research. Even the so called evidence around Jesus’s existence as a normal rabbi leaves much to be desired, let alone all the hyperbolic claims made in the Bible. Either there was some historical “Jesus” who taught some things and got crucified for something, or there never was. If there was, then almost all the evidence about him got lost to time, which makes me think he was no way near influential as Christians say he was.

    Liked by 2 people

      1. I’m intrigued that the blogger directly challenges us atheists yet also doesn’t allow us to write any response on their page. Guess that’s the norm for these blogs.

        Like

      2. it’s very typical. These christians are terrified of atheists since we dare not to agree with them and we can show where their nonsense fails. The pastors are often the most scared, since if they allow comments, they aren’t seen as the unquestioned leader anymore.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to clubschadenfreude Cancel reply