Found this on Infidels.org: “A Lawyer Evaluates the Minimal Facts Approach by Robert G. Mille r | October 5, 2024
Along with using modern law practice to show how Gary Habermas’ claims fail, it has an interesting hypothesis about Peter and James.
Not So Polite Dinner Conversation – an interesting paper tearing apart the “minimal facts” apologetics
Published
Club Schadenfreude 
Habermas needed several volumes?
Jesus H, I could have done it in a sentence!
😂
LikeLike
well, yes. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
and he still can’t show these hundreds of “scholars” who supposedly agree with him. Such a classic fraud.
LikeLike
Indeed he is.
LikeLike
There are no minimal facts.
LikeLike
If a religion can’t stand up in a court of law, how and why is it, this religion is proposed as factual? And believed, stated, as factual?
It’s like orange idiot “facts.” He just says the most moronic crap you could imagine, and people believe it, without question.
My summation, people are gullible fools, and the church is in it for the $$$.
Thank you your honor.
LikeLike